Here is column published Monday in the Dispatch. Enjoy!! For five dollahs I’ll send you one of the unpublished ones.
Amend Attitudes, Not State Constitution
To borrow from the soliloquy opening Shakespeare’s “Richard III”: Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by global warning or campaign gasses. I don’t know what happened to winter. It had barely enough ink in it to print a bar code. April flowers bloomed in January and look tired. Augusta National has no azalea blossoms. The land is beautiful, yet finds us standing around and asking, what happened?
I have discarded several drafts of this column in the Microsoft recycle bin. What I had written dripped with irony and scorn. I was mad and I was taking it out on the page and potential readers. On reflection, I decided that I needed a new attitude. This, after all, is a season of renewal and regrowth. If Dick Cheney can get a heart, we all have reason to hope. I decided to write with a sense of hopefulness.
A few weeks ago, President Obama made a few comments about missile defense to President Medvedev of Russia. They talked too near to an open mic. Mitt Romney, going ballistic, has accused Obama of running for president as a straw man, with secret agendas for defense and other matters. However, America has a state department, employing thousands of people. We gather intelligence. We share intelligence with our allies. We have folks dealing with the Russian government on a daily basis. My hope is that whomever we elect as president understands that diplomacy operates on a slightly more sophisticated level than a seventh grade lunchroom: “Mary told Keisha to tell me to tell you that Amelia is interested in your friend Alexander.”
A few days ago, a member of the White House press staff described the rabidly Republican budget as having been passed by a “rump” congress. CNN convened a panel to discuss what he possibly could have meant. The panel seemed to agree that the rump was the most unsavory part of an animal. No one on the panel betrayed any awareness that “rump” is commonly used to describe to a legislative body that is irregularly or illegally constituted – so named after the Rump Parliament that approved the beheading of Charles I of England. A few weeks ago, a blogger on the John Locke Society posted a cartoon of Obama in leathers eating a bucket of fried chicken. She said she did not realize the cartoon could cause offense. Our political discourse seems commanded by dopes. My sincere hope is that nationally the quality and depth of education in history, culture and politics will rapidly improve.
Starting in middle school, at least in Lexington, my generation of students was encouraged to read fundamental texts, to discuss and learn the substance of and the differences between the various “isms” posed for organizing societies and economies: communism, socialism, capitalism, national socialism. Other students in other places must have learned otherwise, and it is their narrow scope of understanding that seems to dominate the national dialog. You would expect the term “socialist” to merit at least a paragraph or two in the dictionary of debate. Instead, “socialist” now has only a two word definition: “black President.” My hope is that a day will soon arrive in which our discussion of serious ideas is conducted at a loftier height than than childish name-calling or school-yard taunts.
North Carolinians will soon vote whether to amend our state constitution to restrict civil marriage to one woman, one man. Folks argue this amendment will somehow “protect” marriage and the family. Under the law of North Carolina as it now stands, the following people can get married at the drop of a hat, without any questions asked or objections raised: Hell’s Angels, Black Panthers, philanderers, nudists, Outlaws, Latin Kings, eaters of Brussels sprouts, Crips, NPR contributors, Al Quaeda, Ku Klux Klanners, Duke Blue Devils, terrorists, yard-sale shoppers, Hezbollah, anarchists, Rotarians, Aryan Nationalists, Hamas, Nazis, Mafiosi, Unitarians, felons, La Cosa Nostra, mercenaries, misdemeanants, fly-fishers, traitors and casserole bakers. And these people chose what they’ll be, they aren’t born that way.
Instead targeting people who actually disgrace the institution of marriage, the proposed amendment specifically discriminates against gays. It would ban the judiciary and General Assemblyfrom giving gays the right to marry. I may be missing something, but it seems to me that the institution would be strengthened not weakened, by admission of good, devoted people eager to live as married couples, ready to enrich society, not contaminate it. The last hope I express in this column is that in May, North Carolinians will resoundingly defeat the proposed constitutional amendment that would discriminate against gays.
Ben Philpott has a new Attitude, which he hopes to drive it across country when his vision improves. Post comments to FunkyBeno@wordpress.com.